Psst! Create a DigitalOcean account and get $200 in free credit for cloud-based hosting and services.
-
Ethan Thatcher
Permalink to comment#
Again, what do the ‘Before’ and ‘After’ elements do?
Reply
-
Subin Varghese
Permalink to comment#
Check the “More Resources” section. The first link itself is “A whole bunch of cool stuff they can do.”
-
Vin
Permalink to comment#
I know I’m about 3 years late..but, nonetheless –
They just add content before or after specific elements.
Say I want a question mark ( ? ) added after every element.
I would style it like this:
<style>p::after{content: "?"}</style><p>Turn down for what</p>
Would give the following output:
Turn down for what?
Simple as that! ;)
“But why bother using them?” You may ask.
Apart from the obvious effort saving reasons, these are used to implement some cool css tricks!Check out the ribbon at the bottom here: http://cybernext.in
Pure CSS my friend! The ribbon’s folded corners make use of ::before and ::after pseudo elements.
Check this out for more : https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/ribbon/
-
Dave
Permalink to comment#
I think you already knew the significance of :before & :after.
-
-
Druid of Lûhn
Permalink to comment#
This is something that interests me (:before and :after).
But you’ve still kept the clipped sprite from the video.Reply
-
Arkar Htun
Permalink to comment#
Hi teacher
Can I write html tags within before and after?
-
-
kevin
Permalink to comment#
android support?
Reply
-
Clark
Permalink to comment#
This may be a silly question, but I have some confusion over the use of 2 colons to define a pseudo element.
i.e.,
div:after {}vs.
div::after {}I have seen many resources on the Internet (and articles on this site) that use a single colon, but it seems that some “newer” references use double colons. In real-world use (at least as far IE is concerned, IE8 specifically), the double colon is not compatible, but the single colon usage works in IE8 and all newer browsers (at least the ones I’ve tested). So, if a single colon works, why would I ever use double colons?
So, can someone explain the reason behind the use of the double colons?
Reply
-
Clark
Permalink to comment#
Oops… I guess I should have completely read the article above which summarizes the fact that IE8 doesn’t support double colon usage, and recommended to use single colons for now… that basically answers my question. Thanks.
-
Edis
Permalink to comment#
It is not that silly at all. So, in all CSS versions up to and including CSS 2.1 there was no way to differentiate what is pseudo-class and what is pseudo-element.
I am still a beginner web developer, and although I now know a lot more than when I started, it is still sometimes confusing to properly differentiate what is pseudo-element and what is pseudo-class. The problem I believe many of us still share.
It is so much easier to to remember that two colon (::) syntax means pseudo-element, and that one colon (:) syntax means pseudo-class. No more guess work involved.
-
Thiago Frias
Permalink to comment#
Is for semantic and better understand of the code, double colons is for pseudo element like ::first-line, ::-vendor-scrollbar and single colon is for pseudo class like :hover,** :active**
-
-
brendan
Permalink to comment#
Is this not an example of ::before rather than ::after?
hi
— Rest of stuff in side div —Reply
-
Edis
Permalink to comment#
In this particular case, no it is not an example of ::before pseudo-element. Let me explain it:
Pseudo-element generates a virtual element as a last child element inside targeted element. In case you did not know every letter in an element is in a sort of a virtual element called line box. In this case the <div> element was empty (no text, no line box), and when the ::after pseudo-element was created his content “hi” string (generated by content property), was the only thing inside that <div> element, and that is the little illusion that is confusing you.
For example, if you add any text in that <div> element, that “hi” string will end up as the last content in that element.
I hope that helps to clarify things for you, at least a little bit.
-
Firoz
Permalink to comment#
I want to learnt after and before.
how to learnt about the after and before ?
please I want to solution -
Firoz
Permalink to comment#
after before
-
NicC
Permalink to comment#
Would anyone use :before or :after in the tag to generate a page header & footer? Is this semantically correct to apply a pseudo element to the tag?
Example:
html:after { content: “© 2012. All Rights Reserved.”; background-color: transparent; font-size:x-small; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-left: 40%; text-align: center; padding-bottom: 20px;}
Reply
-
Edis
Permalink to comment#
I do not think so, because content of the pseudo-element is not in the DOM (can not even be selected), therefore it only exists visually for the users of visual browsers, and that excludes screen readers and web crawlers which is not a good practice.
The CSS :after pseudo-element matches a virtual last child of the selected element. Typically used to add cosmetic content to an element, by using the content CSS property. This element is inline by default.
The emphasis is mine. Source: MDN Docs
-
-
Kyle
Permalink to comment#
Aren’t the HTML examples backwards for ::after and ::before?
Reply
-
RZK
Permalink to comment#
hi
— Rest of stuff in side div —must be change to
— Rest of stuff in side div —
hiReply
-
Makis Tracend
Permalink to comment#
Today I used this information to create a common loading overlay for web apps:
https://gist.github.com/tracend/8553152Thanks!
Reply
-
Lakshya
Permalink to comment#
That’s cool but what is the > difference between them
Reply
-
Jayanta Boruah
Permalink to comment#
Thanks for explaining the difference between : and : :
Reply
-
Mohammad Heydari
Permalink to comment#
Simple and Perfect
-
shishir
Permalink to comment#
I dont think it works in android default browzer :(..Any solution ?
Reply
-
Seldom
Permalink to comment#
Thanks for the clarification about using double-colons versus not. I’d read elsewhere not to use them, which frustrated me a bit, as I thought they were a helpful in the code visually speaking.
I see why people were saying not to use them (for the compatibility reason with older IE-versions), but my designing-with-legacy-IE-versions-in-mind days are over, so it’s double-colons on out from here!
Reply
-
Firoz
Permalink to comment#
I want to learnt after and before.
how to learnt about the after and before ?
please I want to solution
-
-
Salman
Permalink to comment#
HI every one in need to give background. But the main issue is want to that the backgrond should apply from left to right and as its come to right site the hight of background should decrease as it come to right side ……… how can i apply it in CSS3
Reply
-
AJ Kandy
Permalink to comment#
Resurrecting this thread – is it possible to apply a pseudo-element to :after content? For instance, if you wanted to apply :first-letter to it in a neat CSS way, vs. having to hack it with some sort of targeted JS string parsing.
Reply
-
Deangelis
Permalink to comment#
Reply
-
srinivas
Permalink to comment#
i use before tag to paragraph. i use image in that before tag. how can i fix the hight and width of that image.
Reply
-
Ionut Botizan
Permalink to comment#
You forgot the
attr
function which allows you to do stuff like:[data-tooltip]::before { content: attr(data-tooltip); /* ... */}
Reply
-
Randall Glass
Permalink to comment#
The content image can be resized.
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><style>.image:before {display:inline-block;content:url("MyImage.png"); -webkit-transform: scale(0.5); -moz-transform: scale(0.5);}.image {width:300px;height:300px;}</style></head><body><div class="image"></div></body></html>
Reply
-
Tobitron
Permalink to comment#
So what is the benefit of using ::after/::before vs using JQuery. I’m having trouble imagining a scenario when I wouldn’t just do this in jQuery.
Reply
-
Simon
Permalink to comment#
Besides the obvious reasons that you’re using “native” implementations (giving you a better understanding of what you’re actually doing), using a CSS pseudo element is faster than using JavaScript. DOM manipulation is very expensive.
-
Tobitron
Permalink to comment#
Great answer, thanks!
-
-
Amitoj Singh
Permalink to comment#
Great. Wanted to learn this “after before” thing since long but learned today only when stucked into something that needs this knowledge to proceed. Wanted to code heading decorations on two projects of mine ( lotterywale and punjabstatelottery)
I hope I will be able to code that successfully. Will ask for help here otherwise.
Thanks much,
AmitojReply
-
JJ
Permalink to comment#
Is it possible to use the psuedo elements within a class?
e.g.
.className li::before {
}
Thanks
Reply
-
Sarbjit Singh
Permalink to comment#
What is the use of after before element in CSS selector?
Reply
-
lechant
Permalink to comment#
Im sorry but whats the difference between inserting the css properties into the class with the after selector (.example:after{position:absolute;}) and just inserting it into the class itself (.example{position:absolute;}) , i dont quite get the concept behind this.
Reply
-
Geoff Graham
Permalink to comment#
It is pretty confusing, but there is indeed a difference. Both
::before
and::after
are called pseudo-elements because they elements in and of themselves that are distinct but directly related to the element they are attached to.I other words,
.my-class::after
is very much an element like.my-class
and can be styled apart from it. Chris has an oldie but goodie on how they work and some interesting things you can do with them: https://css-tricks.com/pseudo-element-roundup/
-
-
-
Geoff Graham
Permalink to comment#
Yes, it does. Something like this:
a::before {
content: "";
/* other properties */
}
-
-
Mehmet Yıldırım
Permalink to comment#
*,
*:before,
*:after {}
what does it mean ?
Reply
-
Chris Coyier
Permalink to comment#
It’s selecting the before/after pseudo-elements for ALL elements. The * means “any tag”.
-
-
Carlos
Permalink to comment#
Where’s ::selection ?
Reply
-
Geoff Graham
Permalink to comment#
::selection
-
-
BabakFP
Permalink to comment#
This doesn’t work
body :not(i, [class=-icon], [class*=dashicons], ::before, ::after)
font-family: $font-family !important…but this works
body :not(i, [class=-icon], [class=dashicons]),
body:not()::before,
body:not(*)::after
font-family: $font-family !importantPlease add it to your article because there is no article about this issue.
Reply